We condemn the war and support Ukraine in its struggle for democratic values.
We also encourage you to join the #StandWithUkraine movement by making a donation at this link
Bottled Versus Tapped

The article “Which Type of Water is Better? The Answer May Surprise You” by Cody Crane presents an argument regarding water that is safe, cheap, and environmental friendly for human consumption. The author commences the article by summarizing the background information regarding bottled and tap water. Cody Crane notes that the number of people that prefer bottled water has significantly increased in the recent past. He blames this on the fact that people are duped to think that bottled water emanates from underground springs, which ensures the purity of the water. In addition, Cody Crane observes that people prefer bottles water because it is portable and ready to drink. However, the author points out that tapped water is equally and to some extent more preferable than bottled water regarding the treatment it undergoes before reaching the consumers and that it is economical.

This explicates reasons why tapped water is economical and provides a reaction to Cody Crene’s article.

Cody Crane (2011) indicates that tapped water is better than bottled water because it undergoes severe measures of cleanliness. Concerning this, the author observes that tapped water is better than bottled water, which is not subjected to the same tests as bottled water. The author tells that there are two different bodies oversee bottled and tapped water, but the body that oversees tapped water has stricter measures than that overseeing the bottled water. Thus, the fact that city checks the safety of tapped water myriad times a month and provides the public with a report regarding the safety of the water proves that tapped water is better than bottled.

Another reason advanced by the author concerns economical value of the tapped and bottled water. Cody observes that, despite the fact that tapped water is paid for on a monthly basis, its cost cannot be compared to that of bottled water, which can be 2,000 times more expensive than tapped water. Cody Crane indicates that the cost charged on bottled water is not because of the purity of the water, but because of the bottling and marketing charges. He reiterates that most of the bottled water in the market usually originates from municipal tap water.

Cody Crane also observes the economic effects of bottled and tapped water. In this context, he asserts that tapped water is preferable as it is environment friendly because it does not result to pollution of the environment. The article points out that Americans toss close to 1400 bottles in a second, and the sickening news is that only 30 percent of these bottles get recycled. Thus, the author advises that tapped water can also be portable, and this requires a person to invest on a recyclable bottle of water, which saves the environment.

Fourthly, the article indicates that tapped water tastes natural, and it is better than bottled water. This emanates from the fact that, unlike bottled water that is adjusted in terms of taste, tapped water depends on chlorine for removal of microbes and to disinfect. This leaves a minimal smell and taste in the water, which is natural unlike bottled water, in which the companies adjust the taste intentionally. The article concludes by encouraging people to take several glasses of water per day as it is calorie free and replenishes the body. The author observes that no matter the type of water a person opts to, it is still fair to the body because both bottled and tapped water do not dehydrate a person.

Cody Crane (2011) offers a compelling argument regarding the type of water that is healthy for human consumption. However, at the conclusion of the article, a reader cannot fail to notice the author taking another stance from what he advocated earlier. Thus, it will be better if the author takes a stance regarding tapped and bottled water and not to discourage people from taking bottled water while at the conclusion of the essay he states the fact that bottled water is equally beneficial for the body as tapped water. This sends unclear messages to a reader who expects to be provided with a viable solution at the end of the essay, only to be compromised to take either tapped or bottled water.

The article also falters in its argument regarding the safety of tapped and bottled water. This is because the author indicates that tapped water undergoes severe measures of cleanliness. I believe bottled water also undergoes the same levels of cleanliness because no company will want to harm their image by selling to customers’ water that does not meet the prescribed health requirements. Thus, the author should have given both tapped and bottled water credence regarding cleanliness than inclining one side while at the end he justifies both waters as having a nutritional value.

In conclusion, the Cody Crane provides an argument regarding the best water for consumption whereby he outlines several points in support of tapped water. These include the fact that tapped water is economical, environmental friendly, natural, and undergoes strict measures of cleanliness. However, I object the fact that the author deems tapped water to be cleaner than bottled water as no company would want to harm its image by selling substandard product to consumers. Despite that, the author advances a valid reason regarding environmental friendliness of tapped water. Cody Crane points out that Americans toss close to 1400 bottles in a second and only 30 percent of these bottles gets recycled. This is a point that needs to be taken seriously because it can result to environmental degradation.

Order now

Related essays