We condemn the war and support Ukraine in its struggle for democratic values.
We also encourage you to join the #StandWithUkraine movement by making a donation at this link
Experimental Psychology


Experimental psychology is a formation of the paradigm of science that is used to explain perceptions of the mind and the ways people behave. It is done through providing a platform for methodology planning and interpretation of consequent results of a research. It is vital in relaying an insight into a subjective aspect of the human mind and behavior therein. This view implies that interdependence between experimental psychology and science is symbiotic to the extent that the field of experimental psychology emphasizes the experimentation part with resultant methodology to achieve experimentation, while the scientific part of this study is useful in explaining results gained from applied experimental methodology.

Broader categories of experimental psychology are defined by restrictions of methods of experimentation. Additionally, cognitive processes that determine behavior in living things rely upon the principles of scientific laws to come up with subjective explanations of the resultant evidence gained throughout these fundamental processes of experimental psychology. A close relationship between scientific laws that determine the results from methodology of experimental psychology could give a lead to a resultant explanation of concepts that underlie an essential experiment process of psychology.

Experimental Psychology as a Science

First of all, human cognition is formed out of ambiguity in mental processes which determine the way of manifestation of behavior. In order to understand these mental processes, an approach where an experimenter and an experiment participant form a single entity has been used. It implies that in studies of the attributes of human behavior, it is human beings who form a foundation of a study, which brings about inadequacy in a process due to the lack of a formal consent approach system. Considering human mental aspects as a subject of a study and as a tool for implementation of an experimentation process, it is possible to elucidate jeopardy in final experimental results. Even though incongruities exist, scientific application of controlling statistical methods through relaying a formal order of experimentation aids in minimizing bias in the process of an experiment. In psychological experimentation, attributes that aid in eliminating errors, like deviations from the normal, define experimental psychology as being based on scientific principles. Moreover, bias in experiment processes could not be determined without the right application of what is scientifically proven and what is considered theoretical.

On the other hand, interpretation of results in experimental psychology through the mirror of replication of an experiment process could provide an evidence of its relation to the scientific world. It is explained through analysis of evidence from scientific experiments, where a number of experimentalists come up with similar answers to theorems through replicating experimental essence to prove a scientific law. For instance, the law of gravity defines the force that pulls objects towards the Earth’s surface. Different experimentalists carrying out the same experiment would also come up with results that are in line with this proven theory. Basing on this evidence, results in experimental psychology are also a subject to an assumption that same theories give similar results even after a replication of an experiment. For instance, the resultant evidence from an experiment on continued abuse of drugs shows that it results in high levels of mental stress. Furthermore, the evidence that is based upon the analysis of subsequent and replicated experiment processes shows that results of those studies might be of no significant difference. It gives an explanation to the supportive evidence that the randomized mode of theorization is a useful tool for finding the resultant proof of scientific theories, both in the world of science and the world of experimental psychology, where a valid replication process provides similarity in results.


It is, therefore, obvious that the arena of experimental psychology that deals with methodological interpretation of psychological aspects of the human mind is a field of science, where the principles of coverage are more or less the same. It shows that the resultant evidence from methodology of experimental psychology is based on scientific principles, while the practical evidence is determined through the proof of randomized theories.

Order now

Related essays